Strategies for the development of cyber-ophthalmology
Y. Danyk1, O. Zborovska2, N. Pasyechnikova2
1 Institute of Information Technologies; Kyiv (Ukraine)
2 SI "Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy, NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)
TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Danyk Y, Zborovska O, Pasyechnikova N. Strategies for the development of cyber-ophthalmology. J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2020;5:79-85. http://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh202057985
Background: Making the tertiary management of eye diseases improved and widely available for all social groups in all parts of Ukraine is a pressing challenge for not only the Ministry of Health, but also for the state.
Purpose: To provide scientific and theoretical assessment of establishing a new branch of ophthalmology, cyber-ophthalmology.
Results: We demonstrated that the studied issue is relevant and important in the light of developments in tele- and cyber-medicine, expansion of application of information technologies to and introduction of artificial intelligence in medicine and in particular in ophthalmology.
Conclusion: Cyber-ophthalmology is becoming reality and a systematically important branch of ophthalmology. Research in and developments of this branch are essential for providing tertiary eye disease management and improved disease treatment efficacy for all social groups.
Keywords: cyber-ophthalmology, cyber-medicine, telemedicine, artificial intelligence, neurocomputer interface, cybersecurity
1.Karmazina OO, Release Officer. [Healthcare institutions in and disease prevalences in the population of Ukraine in 2017]. Kyiv: State Statistics Service of Ukraine; 2018. Ukrainian.
2.Visual prosthesis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_prosthesis
3.Iakushenko LM. [Current issues of social protection of disabled persons]. Sotsialna polityka. 2009;9. Ukrainian.
4.Chun DW, Heier JS, Raizman MB. Visual prosthetic device for bilateral end–stage macular degeneration. Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2005 Nov;2(6):657-65.
5.Farandos NM, Yetisen AK, Monteiro MJ, et al. Contact Lens Sensors in Ocular Diagnostics. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015;4:792–810.
6.Fernandes RA, Diniz B, Ribeiro R, Humayun M. Artificial vision through neuronal stimulation. Neurosci Lett. 2012;519(2):122–8.
7.Miyawaki Y, Uchida H, Yamashita O, et al. Visual Image Reconstruction from Human Brain Activity using a Combination of Multiscale Local Image Decoders. Neuron. 2008 Dec 10;60(5):915-29.
8.Rush AD, Troyk PR. A power and data link for a wireless–implanted neural recording system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012 Nov;59(11):3255-62.
9.Santhanam G, Ryu SI, Yu BM, et al. A high–performance brain–computer interface. 2006 Jul 13;442(7099):195-8.
10.Vidal J. Toward Direct Brain–Computer Communication. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1973;2:157-80.
11.Wolpaw JR, McFarland DJ, Neat GW, et al. An EEG–based brain–computer interface for cursor control. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Mar;78(3):252-9.
12.Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, Heetderks WJ, et al. Brain–Computer Interface Technology: A Review of the First International Meeting. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000 Jun;8(2):164-73.
13.Fernandes RA, Diniz B, Ribeiro R. Artificial vision through neuronal stimulation. Neuroscience Letters. 2012;519(2):122-8.
The authors certify that they have no conflicts of interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.