J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2021;5:47-55.

http://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh202154755

Received: 15 July 2021; Published on-line: 23 October 2021


Effect of optical-reflection method of accommodative facility training on meridional acuity in astigmats with amblyopia 

V. A. Kolomiyets, O. V. Kachan

SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)

E-mail: kolomiets.wa@gmail.com

 

Background: The efficacy of accommodative facility training as a method of treatment for meridional amblyopia (MA) in astigmatic children with amblyopia was studied.  MA manifests itself as selective alterations in visual acuity (VA), with substantial differences in the ability to resolve contours of different orientations, and may cause impairments in mechanisms of integrated processing of visual stimulus, development of cognitive abilities in children and visual performance.

Purpose: To assess the effect of optical-reflection method of accommodative facility training on vernier acuity in meridians (MVA) in the treatment of astigmatic children with amblyopia.

Material and Methods: Twenty seven children aged 5 to 12 years, with both refractive amblyopia and with-the-rule hyperopic astigmatism were included in the study, and underwent an examination. The spherical component of refraction ranged from +0.5D to +5.5D, and the cylindical component, from 0.5D to 4.5D. Best-corrected visual acuity (Sivtsev Chart) was assessed. Accommodative facility training was performed monocularly by image defocusing with lenses of a variable power. A +0.5-D sphere was placed just in front of the best correction for the study eye in order to blur this line. The +0.5-D sphere was replaced by a -0.5-D sphere after the optotypes became clearly visible. Thereafter, the training cycle was repeated using a ±0.75-D sphere and, subsequently, a ±1.0-D sphere. Lens power was gradually increased until it could be compensated by accommodation. The treatment course consisted of one training session a day for 10 days. Special computer software was used to determine corrected MVA. Linear objects were presented on the computer screen, and the smallest lateral displacement of one line from another that can be detected by the examinee will characterize the level of MVA.

Results: A new algorithm was proposed for assessing the efficacy of treatment of MA in astigmats, with refractive asymmetries and meridional asymmetries in vernier acuity considered as vector quantities. It was demonstrated that a group of amblyops with the same type of astigmatism was not homogeneous. It was found possible to split such a group of patients into three clusters that differ in the type of variation in meridional acuity in the orthogonal meridians compared to refractive asymmetries. One cluster had equal vernier acuities in the vertical and horizontal meridians, the second had vernier acuity in the horizontal meridian better than in the vertical meridian, and the third had vernier acuity in the horizontal meridian worse than in the vertical meridian. MVA was greater in magnitude in one of the orthogonal meridians than in another in the dominant eyes in 37% of study patients, and in the fellow eyes in 50% of study patients. MVA values in the orthogonal meridians were similar in 56.6% of study patients. There was a 15.1-percent increase, from 56.6% to 71.1% in the number of eyes with a similar vernier acuity in the orthogonal meridians after treatment. A positive effect was achieved through elimination of meridional asymmetry in vernier acuity in a portion of patients from clusters that differ in the direction of meridional asymmetry in vernier acuity. In addition, the number of eyes in the category of patients with a visual acuity of 0.75-0.8 (as assessed with complex optotypes) increased by 11.35%.

Conclusion: The efficacy of treatment for MA should be assessed in homogeneous clusters with similar direction of meridional asymmetry in visual acuity. Preliminary data on the efficacy of treatment of amblyopia by accommodative facility training allows considering this training as a method of treatment for meridional amblyopia. The method of determination of meridional acuity should be included in the standard examination of patients with amblyopia.  

Keywords: astigmatism, meridional amblyopia, meridional variations in visual acuity, amblyopia treatment

 

References

1. Dobson V, Miller JM, Harvey EM, Mohan KM, et al. Amblyopia in astigmatic preschool children. Vis Res. 2003 Apr;43(9):1081–90. 

Crossref  

2. Gwiazda J, Bauer J, Thorn F, Held R. Meridional amblyopia does result from astigmatism in early childhood. Clinical Vision Science. 1986;1:145–52.

Hubel DH. Eye, brain, and vision New York: Scientific American Library;1988. 

3.Freeman RD, Mitchell DE, Millodot M. A Neural Effect of Partial Visual Deprivation in Humans. Science. 1972 Mar 24;175(4028):1384-6.

Crossref  PubMed

4.Mitchell DE, Freeman M, Millodot M, Haegerstrom G. Meridional amblyopia: evidence for modification of the human visual system by early visual experience. Vision Res. 1973 Mar;13(3):535-8.

Crossref 

5.Vit VV. [The structure of the human visual system] Odessa: Astroprint; 2003. 

6.Polat U, Bonneh Y, Ma-Naim T, et al. Spatial interactions in amblyopia: Effects of stimulus parameters and amblyopia type. Vision Res. 2005 May;45(11):1471-9.

Crossref  PubMed

 7.Lavrent’ev BF, Rozhentsov VV. [Instrumental treatment of amblyopia]. Ophthalmology in Russia.  2016;13(3):144–50. doi: 10.18008/1816–5095–2016–3–144–150. Russian.Crossref 

8.   Botabekova TK,  Kurgambekova NS.. [A comparative analysis of the efficiency of different methods in the treatment of amblyopia]. Vestn Oftalmol. 2004 Sep-Oct;120(5):40-1. Russian.

9.Abrahamsson M, Sjöstrand J. Astigmatic axis and amblyopia in childhood. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003 Feb;81(1):33–7.

Crossref  PubMed

10. Harvey EM, Dobson V, Miller JM, Clifford-Donaldson CE. Amblyopia in astigmatic children: patterns of deficits. Vision Res . 2007; 47: 315–26.

Crossref  PubMed

11. Harvey EM. Development and Treatment of Astigmatism-Related Amblyopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Jun;86(6):634-9.

Crossref  PubMed

12. Harvey EM, Dobson V, Clifford-Donaldson CE, Miller JM.Optical treatment of amblyopia in astigmatic children: the sensitive period for successful treatment. Ophthalmology. 2007 Dec;114(12):2293-301.

Crossref  PubMed

13. Flynn JT. Amblyopia: its treatment today and its portent for the future. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q.  2000;15(2):109.

14. Flynn JT, Cassady JC. Current trends in amblyopia therapy. Ophthalmology. 1978;85:428-50. 

Crossref 

15. Kämpf U, Mascolus W, Muchamedjarow F, et al. Coherence induction via phase conjugate adaptive resonance coupling: Computer-generated sinusoidal grating patterns as a background stimulus in amblyopia treatment. J Psychophysiology. 2006; 20(2):149.

16. Kampf U, Shamshinova A, Kaschtschenko T, et al. Long-term application of computer-based pleoptics in home therapy: selected results of a prospective multicenter study. Strabismus. 2008;16(4):149-58. 

Crossref  PubMed

17. Kempf W, Rychkova SI, Haim E, Mukhamedyarov F. [Comparative results of the application of moving and fixed sinusoidal framework in functional treatment of amblyopia]. Tochka zreniia. Vostok-Zapad. 2016;3:140-43. Russian.

18. Deshpande PG, Bhalchandra PC, Nalgirkar AR, Tathe SR. Improvement of visual acuity in residual meridional amblyopia by astigmatic axis video games. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug; 66(8): 1156–60.

Crossref  PubMed

19.  Аznaurjan IE, Gorlacheva LI. LASIK in complex treatment of meridional form of refractive amblyopia in children with astigmatism. Refractive Surgery Updates. Italy, Venice, June 2002. р.112-3. 

20. Boubaker Hafedh ВA. [Significance of accommodation therapy in complex treatment of children with different kinds of hypermetropic amblyopia]. [Abstract of a Thesis for the Degree of Cand Sc (Med)]. Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy. Odesa, Ukraine; 1998. Russian.

21. Stalnov VS. [Effect of different pleoptic treatments on accommodation in pediatric disbinocular amblyopia].  [Abstract of a Thesis for the Degree of Cand Sc (Med)]. Krasnoiarsk; 2006. Russian. 

22. Serdiuchenko VI, Gilko OV. [Efficacy of accommodation facility training in children with mixed astigmatism] In: [Proceedings of the International Conference on Myopia and Errors of Refraction, Accommodation, and Ocular Motility]. Moscow;2001. p.236-7. Russian.

23. Shamshinova AM, Volkov VV. [Functional methods of research in ophthalmology]. Moscow: Meditsina; 1999. Russian.

24. Kolomiyets V, Bandura M, Kolomiyets N. [Meridional vernier visual acuity in children and adults with hypermetropic  astigmatism]. Oftalmologiia. Vostochania Evropa. 2015; 3(26):27-34. Russian.

25. Kolomiyets V, Bandura M, Kolomiyets N. [Peculiarities of vernier monocular and binocular visual acuity in the retinal orthogonal meridians in patients with hypermetropic astigmatism].  ScienceRise. 2015; 6/4(11):38-44. Russian. 

Crossref 

 

 

 

 

Conflict of Interest: 

Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest that might influence their opinion on the subject matter or materials described or discussed in this manuscript.