J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2021;1:24-31.

http://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh202112431

Received: 30 June 2020; Published on-line: 12 February 2021


Cytological features of the bulbar conjunctiva in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

T. M. Zhmud,1 G. I. Drozhzhyna,2  A. V. Demchuk 3 

1 Pirogov Vinnytsia National Medical University; Vinnytsia (Ukraine)

2 The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine;  Odesa (Ukraine)

3 Podilsky Regional Center of Oncology of the Vinnytsia Regional Council"; Vinnytsia (Ukraine)

E-mail: gtatyana@email.ua

TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Zhmud TM, Drozhzhyna GI, Demchuk AV. Cytological features of the bulbar conjunctiva in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2020;6:24-31.   http://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh202112431


Background: Pathologic changes in the ocular surface in diabetes mellitus (DM) may result from various causes such as metabolic abnormalities (hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia, leading to changes in tear composition), perilimbal vascular microangiopathy (leading to impaired blood supply to the cornea), lacrimal gland lesions, and various abnormalities in innervation.

Purpose: To determine the cytological features of the bulbar conjunctival epithelium in patients with T2DM.

Material and Methods: We analyzed clinical and impressive cytology data of 34 patients (18 (52.9%) men and 16 (47.1%) women; age, 50 to 79 years) having clinical signs of dry eye disease (DED). Patients were divided into two equal groups of 17 patients each, group 1 (diabetes duration of less than 5 years) and group 2 (diabetes duration of more than 5 years). They underwent Schirmer 1 test, tear break-up time (TBUT) test, and impression cytology of the bulbar conjunctiva. The cytologic changes of the bulbar conjunctiva were graded according to Nelson’s grading system.

Results: Comparison of clinical and cytolological characteristics of study patients suggests that, severity, duration and course pattern of diabetes mellitus affect the development of compensatory and adaptive mechanisms in the bulbar conjunctival epithelium, these mechanisms being reflected by the formation of the surface epithelium of increased density due to squamous metaplasia and keratinization.

Conclusion: Our impression cytology study of the bulbar conjunctival epithelium found that most patients (94.1%) with T2DM had squamous metaplasia grade (Nelson) of 2 or 3, and 80% of those with squamous metaplasia grade (Nelson) of 3 had T2DM duration of more than 5 years. In addition, squamous metaplasia of grade 3 was fourfold more common among patients with T2DM duration of more than 5 years than among those with T2DM duration of less than 5 years.

Keywords: impression cytology, bulbar conjunctiva, type 2 diabetes mellitus

 

References

1.Han SB, Yang HK, Hyon JY. Influence of diabetes mellitus on anterior segment of the eye. Clin Interv Aging. 2019; 14: 53–63. 

Crossref   PubMed 

2.Seifart U, Strempel I. [The dry eye and diabetes mellitus]. Ophthalmologe. 1994 Apr;91(2):235-9. German.

3.Winebrake JP, Drinkwater OJ, Brissette AR, et al. The TFOS Dry Eye Workshop II: Key Updates. Ophthalmic Pearls. CORNEA. 2017.

4.Grigorieva NN, Peich ME, Shadrichev FE. [Trehalose efficacy in dry eye syndrome therapy in diabetic patients]. Oftalmologicheskiie vedomosti. 2016;9(2):19–24.  

Crossref  

5.Bezditko PA, Zavoloka OV, Lysenko MG. [Corneal changes in patients with diabetic retinopathy]. Oftalmol Zh. 2009;3:12-4. Ukrainian. 

Crossref 

6.Swamynathan SK, Wells A. Conjunctival goblet cells: Ocular surface functions, disorders that affect them, and the potential for their regeneration. Ocul Surf. 2020 Jan;18(1):19-26. 

Crossref  PubMed 

7.Doughty MJ. Goblet cells of the normal human bulbar conjunctiva and their assessment by impression cytology sampling. Ocul Surf. 2012 Jul;10(3):149-69.

Crossref  PubMed 

8.McKown RL, Wanf N, Raab RW, et al. Lacritin and other new proteins of the lacrimal functional unit. Exp Eye Res. 2009 May;88(5):848-58. 

Crossref  PubMed 

9.Zhang X, Zhao L, Deng S, et al. Eye Syndrome in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Prevalence, Etiology, and Clinical Characteristics. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:8201053. 

Crossref  PubMed 

10.Zhmud ТМ, Malachkova NV, Andrushkova OO, et al. Meibomian gland dysfunction and dry eye disease symptoms in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Reports of Morphology. 2019; 25(4):51-5. 

Crossref  

11.Zhmud TM, Drozhzhina GI. Meibomian gland dysfunction accompanied by palpebral demodicosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2019; 6(491):23-8. 

Crossref 

12.Figueroa-Ortiz LC, Jiménez Rodríguez E, García-Ben A, García-Campos J. Study of tear function and the conjunctival surface in diabetic patients.  Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2011 Apr;86(4):107-12. 

Crossref   PubMed  

13.Hom M, De Land P. Self-reported dry eyes and diabetic history. Optometry. 2006;77(11):554–558. 

Crossref   PubMed 

14.Masoud RM, Maryam R, Mohammad AA. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome and diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetic patients. 2008. – № 10 (2008).

15.Dartt DA. Regulation of mucin and fluid secretion by conjunctival epithelial cells. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2002;21:555–76.

Crossref 

16.Gipson IK. The ocular surface: the challenge to enable and protect vision: the Friedenwald lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(4390):4391–8. 

Crossref   PubMed 

17.Calonge M, Diebold Y, Saez V, et al. Impression cytology of the ocular surface: a review. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78(3):457-72. 

Crossref   PubMed 

18.Nelson JDб Wright JC. Conjunctival Goblet Cell Densities in Ocular Surface Disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(7):1049-1051. 

Crossref   PubMed  

19.Petrayevsky AV, Trishkin KS. [Clinical and cytological diagnostics of dry eye syndrome]. Vestnik VGU. 2012;4(44):52-4. Russian.

20.Egorova GB, Fedorov AA, Mitichkina TS, Shamsudinova AR. [Impression cytology changes in the conjunctival epithelial layer in patients with contact lens intolerance]. RMZh. Klinicheskaia oftalmologiia. 2014;1:17-9. Russian.

21.Egorova GB, Fedorov AA, Mitichkina TS.  [Potential of impression cytology in diagnosis and evaluation of efficacy of pharmacological correction of dry eye syndrome associated with contact lens wearing].  Vestn Oftalmol. 2012 Jan-Feb;128(1):34-6. 

22.Filippello M, Cascone G, Zagami A, Scimone G. Impression cytology in Down syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81(8):683–5. 

Crossref   PubMed 

23.Pavlovskyi MI, Vit VV, Drozhzhyna GI. [Citological features of the conjunctival epithelium in dry eye syndrome in patients with subclinical and manifest hypothyroidism]. Oftalmologiia. Vostochnaia Evropa. 2018;8(3):361-8. Russian.

24.Citirik M, Berker N, Haksever H, et al. Conjunctival impression cytology in nonproliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014;7(2): 321–5. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.23.

25.Singh R, Joseph A, Umapathy T, et al. Impression cytology of the ocular surface. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1655-9.

Crossref  PubMed 

26.Goebbels M. Tear secretion and tear film function in insulin dependent diabetics. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jan; 84(1): 19–21. 

Crossref   PubMed  

27.Gillan W. D. H. Conjunctival impression cytology: a review. S Afr Optom. 2008;67(3):136–41.

Crossref 

28.Nepp J, Abela C, Polzer I, et al. Is There a Correlation Between the Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy and Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca? Cornea. 2000 Jul;19(4):487-91. 

Crossref   PubMed

 

 

The authors declare no conflict of interest which could influence their opinions on the subject or the materials presented in the manuscript.