J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2017;6:25-31.

https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201762531

Criteria of severity for macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion: cohort heterogeneity and efficacy evaluation of threshold and subthreshold retinal laser photocoagulation depending on the macular edema severity criteria. Part II. 

T.O. Romanova, a Post Graduate student

SI “Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy”

Odessa, Ukraine

E-mail: romanova-work@rambler.ru                

Background. Macular edema (ME) develops in 60-100% of patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). ME becomes chronic with a decrease in visual acuity in 1/3-2/3 of patients with RVO-associated ME. The gold standard of care to treat patients with macular edema associated with RVO is retinal laser photocoagula-tion.

Purpose. To develop an evaluation system for severity of macular edema asso-ciated with retinal vein occlusion on a ground of morphometrical and clinical characteristics and to compare the efficacy of threshold and subthreshold retinal laser photocoagulation depending on this evaluation.

Material and Methods. A total of 160 patients (160 eyes) with RVO-associated macular edema were included in the study. Laser photocoagulation was performed not before than three months of disease onset. Subthreshold and threshold laser photocoagulation of the macula was performed in 38 and 110 patients, respectively. 12 patients had resorption of edema so they required no laser treatment.  The follow-up period was twelve months. The examination methods used have been described in our previous paper.

Results. The heterogeneity analysis of the cohort of patients with RVO-associated ME was proposed. The clinical burden assessment was developed and criteria of macular edema severity were defined.  There were four clusters that clearly differed in their clinical and morphometric characteristics. Subthreshold laser photocoagulation was shown to be more successful for patients with significant retinal ischemia and threshold laser photocoagulation was more successful for patients with the increased foveal thickness. 

Conclusions. Four cluster distribution of the RVO-associated ME patients made it possible to reduce the heterogeneity of the studied cohort since the defined clusters were homogenous in severity criteria; the patients had similar values within each cluster. Subthreshold photocoagulation was best for the significant ischemic area (>5 DD). For the foveal thickness >547 µm, most successful was threshold laser photocoagulation.

Keywords: macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, laser retinal photocoagulation, clinical symptoms, severity criteria  

References

  1. Vit VV, Buiko AS, Dragomiretskaia EI. [Assessment of malignancy degree of uveal melanoma using clustering analysis]. Oftalmol Zh. 2004;6:18-22. Russian.
  2. Drozhzhyna GI, Dragomiretskaia EI. [Complex assessment of the state of the eye in inherited stromal dystrophies]. Oftalmol Zh. 2005;2:34-8. Russian.
  3. Pasyechnikova NV, Naumenko VA, Kushnir NN. [Determining of degree of disturbance of hematoretinal barrier associated with diabetic retinopathy by fluorometry of the vitreous]. Oftalmol Zh. 2009;3:41-5. Russian.
  4. Rozenblum IuZ. [Vision acuity today and tomorrow]. [Collection of scientific papers (to the memory of A.V. Roslavtsev)]. Moscow; 1999. 25-33. Russia.
  5. Romanova TA, Kulbida MP. Typology of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion: variety of pathomorphological picture of the eye fundus. Part I. Oftalmol Zh. 2017;2:18-24.
  6. Romanova T, Pasechnikova N, Kulbida M. [Effectiveness of the threshold and sub-threshold laser coagulation of the macular area in patients with macular edema because of retinal vein thrombosis]. Oftalmologiia. Vostochnaia Evropa.2017;1(7):33-42. Russian. 
  7. Browning DJ. Retinal vein occlusion. Evidence-based Management. Springer- Science. 2012. 387 p.
  8. Coscas G, Gaudric А. Natural course of nonaphakic cystoid macular edema. Surv. Ophthalmol. 1984;28:471–7.
  9. CVOS-Group. Natural history and clinical management of central retinal vein occlusion. The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol.1997;115:486–91.
  10. Gutman FA, Zegarra Н. The natural course of temporal retinal branch vein occlusion. Trans Am Acag Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol. 1974;78:178 – 92.
  11. Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB. Fundus changes in branch retinal vein occlusion. Retina. 2015;35:1016–27.
  12. Kolar P. Definition and Classification of Retinal Vein Occlusion. Int. J. Oph-thalmic Res. 2016;2:124–9.
  13. Michels RG, Gass JD. The natural course of retinal branch vein obstruction. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol. 1874;78:166–77.
  14. Scholl S, Kirchhof J, Augustin AJ. Pathophysiology of Macular Edema. Ophthalmologica. 2010;224:8–15.