J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2016;1:27-30.

https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201612730

Natural antitumor resistance of the organism condition of patients with uveal melanoma of small sizes

S.I. Polyakova, Doctor of Medical Sciences

L.N. Velichko, PhD in Medical Sciences

A.V. Bogdanova, PhD in Biological Sciences

I.V. Tsukanova, Junior Research Associate

State Institution “The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”

Odessa (Ukraine)

E-mail: inna.sister@mail.ru                       

Introduction. The role of immune mechanisms in the tumor process development and progression is currently beyond any doubt. In this regard, the study of the immune system of patients with choroidal melanoma (CM) is very important at the initial stage of the disease specifically, i. e. CM of small sizes (protruding up to 3 mm), that in general can have a positive effect in the implementation of therapeutic pathomorphism in applying various treatment methods.

Purpose. To examine the immune system condition in patients with CM of small sizes in comparison with healthy individuals control group.

Materials and Methods. An immunological research was implemented in 35 patients with UM  of small sizes before the treatment. These were the patients of SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of NAMS of Ukraine" (treatment group) and 44 healthy people (control group). The average age of the patients in the treatment group and the control group was (53.9 ± 12.1) and (55.4 ± 11.5) respectively. In the treatment group, there were 26 women (74.3%) and 9 (25.7 %) men. In the control group, there were 26 (59.1%) women and 18 (40.9%) men.

In both groups, cellular and humoral immunity components were studied in accordance with generally accepted methods.

Results. Most indicators of both cellular and humoral immunity in patients with CM of small sizes were higher than in healthy individuals. So CM-patients at the initial stage of the disease in comparison with healthy people had a statistically significant increase of such indicators, as the absolute cells count (by 17.5%, p = 0.005), T-lymphocytes CD3+ absolute count (18.6%, p = 0.04), cytotoxic cells CD8+ absolute count (57.9%, p = 0.002), immunoregulatory index ratio CD4+/CD8+ (82.9%, p = 0.00002), immunoglobulin A (30.2%, p = 0.003) and M (21.4% p = 0.0007). At the same time, there was a statistically significant minor (2.8%, p = 0.04) decrease of the relative count of T-lymphocytes CD3+. This indicates that at the initial stage of UM progression, patient's immune system is active.  An increase of absolute (46.3%, p = 0.0004) and relative (by 21.5%, p = 0.007) phagocytic neutrophils activity also indicates the natural resistance of UM-patients at an early stage of the disease.

Conclusions. Uveal melanoma initial stage is accompanied with cellular and humoral specific immunity activation and enhanced antitumor resistance of the organism.

Key words: uveal melanoma, choroidal melanoma

                       

References

1.        Bezrukov AV. [Afterhistory of uveal melanomas]. Tumors and tumor-like ophthalmological diseases: Materials of All-Union conference. Tallinn. 1989:8 - 9. Russian.

2.        Bulgakova ES. Treatment of small choroidal melanoma via transpupillary diode-laser thermotherapy method: abstract of thesis for PhD in Medical Sciences: speciality 14.00.08 “Eye Diseases”. Moscow. 2005:124. Russian.

3.        Vanichkin AA, Bushueva NN, Degtyarenko TV. et al. [Accelerated primary human immunity status test: methodological recommendations]. Odessa. 1990:23. Russian.

4.        Grigoryan SS, Ershov FI. [Clinical efficiency of interferon inducer]. Modern aspects of interferons use. Moscow. 1990:24. Russian.

5.        Gusev GA. Use of immunomodulators in complex treatment of malignant tumors of visual organ: abstract of thesis for PhD in Medical Sciences. Moscow. 1991:25. Russian.

6.        Degtyarenko ТV. Accelerated primary human immunity status test: methodological recommendations. Odessa. 1990:22. Russian.

7.        Ziangirova GG, Likhvantseva VR. [Tumors of eye vascular tract]. Moscow: Poslednee slovo Publ. 2003:456. Russian.

8.        [Classification of choroid melanomas]. Oftalmol Zh. 2010;6:20-31. Russian.

9.        Libman ES, Brovkina AF, Bezrukov AV. [Afterhistory of uveal melanomas. Comparative assessment of enucleation and organ-sparing treatment modes]. Oftalmol Zh. 1989;6:336 -338. Russian.

10.     Maletsky АP. [Characteristics of the immune status of patients with uveal melanomas during organ-sparing treatment]. In: Maletsky AP, Vit VV, Vanichkin AA. Oftalmol Zh.  1989;6:341-345. Russian.

11.     Maletsky AP, Terentyeva LS, Degtyarenko TV, Spirko VK. [Prognostic value of clinical and immunological indicators during organ-sparing treatment in patients with choroidal melanomas]. Oftalmol Zh. 2000;4:30-34. Russian.

12.     Nazarenko GI, Kishkun AA.  [Clinical assessment of the laboratory reports]. Moscow: “Meditsina” Publ. 2000;338:348. Russian.

13.     Velichko LN, Maletsky AP, Vit VV, Terentyeva LS. [Status of the system of antitumour autarcesis in patients with uveal melanomas during  organ-sparing treatment]. Oftalmol Zh. 1998;2:131-138. Russian.

14.     Augsburger JJ, Schroeder RP, Territo C et al. Clinical parameters predictive of enlargement of melanocyte choroidal lesions. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1989;73:911-917.
        Crossref   Pubmed

15.     Limbourg I, Legrain S, De Potter P. Transpupillary thermotherapy for treatment of choroidal melanomas. Bull. Soc. Beige. Ophthalmol. 2002;285:55-64.

16.     Zehetmayer M, Kitz K, Menapace R et al. Local tumor control and morbidity after one to three fractions of stereotactic external beam irradiation for uveal melanoma. In: Radiother. Oncol. 2002;55(2):135-144.
        Crossref   Pubmed

17.     Shields CL, Shields JA. Transpupillary thermotherapy for choroidal melanoma. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 1999;10(3):197-203.
        Crossref   Pubmed

18.     Shields CL, Shields JA. Clinical features of small choroidal melanoma. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2002;13(3):135-141.
        Crossref   Pubmed