Oftalmol Zh.2014;1;24-27

https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201452427

Duration of mono- and binocular structured consequent images as an indicator of retinal correspondence characte

Kolomiets N. V., Kolomiets V. A.

State Institution The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine; Odessa, (Ukraine)

Key words: afterimages, binocular vision, normal retinal correspondence, abnormal retinal correspondence.

Introduction. The complexity of the diagnostic binocular vision nature is that the test merger in color test may be in patients with both normal and abnormal retinal correspondence.

Purpose. To study the duration of the monocular and binocular afterimages in patients with normal and abnormal retinal correspondence to clarify the nature of correspondence of the retina.

Material and methods. The afterimages were caused in patients with normal and abnormal correspondence on one and both eyes by means of tests with a homogeneous field and the black-and-white «chess» patterns.

Results. It was proved that the binocular structured stimuli caused a prolonged aftereffect on binocular system in patients with normal retinal correspondence compared to the duration of monocular afterimages and significantly shorter in patients with abnormal correspondence.

References

1.     Avetisov SE, Kashchenko TP, Shamshinova AM. Visual function in their correction in children: a guide for doctors. M.: Izdatelstvo Medotsina; 2005. 872 p.
2.     Balonov LYa. Consecutive images. L.: Nauka; 1971. 212 p.
3.     Kravkov SV. Eyes and its work. Psychophysiology of vision and hygiene of lighting. 1950. 532 p.
4.     Rozenberg VA. Diagnosis and treatment of disorders of sensory mechanisms of monocular and binocular vision in concomitant strabismus and amblyopia. Thesis for Doctor of Ned. Science. Odessa. 229 p.
5.     Rozenberg VA, Kolomiets VA. Effectiveness of diagnosis of sensory binocular vision disorders in concomitant strabismus in haploscopic and essential conditions. Oftalmol Zh. 1987;1: 10-2. Russian.
6.     Hubell D. Eye, Brain and Vision. M.:Mir; 1990.
7.     Bangerter A. Erster Erfahrungen mit einem modifizierten Synoptophor. Ophthalmologica. 1972;165(3/4):221- 9.
Crossref    Pubmed
8.     Duke-Elder S W. System of ophthalmology. Henry Kimpton, London.1973;1: 873.
9.     Erickson P, Me Gill EC. Role of vision acuity, stereoacuity and ocular dominance in monovision patient success. Optom. Vis. Sci. 1992;18:145- 52.
10.  Lang J. Management of Microtropis. Brit. J. Ophthalm.1974;58:281-92
Crossref   Pubmed