Oftalmol Zh.2012;3:21-24

Full text Pdf 

http://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201232124

PROGNOSTICATION OF SURGICALLY INDUCED ASTIGMATISM AFTER ULTRASOUND EMULSIFICATION OF AGE-RELATED CATARACT

V. O. Kolomiets, S. K. Dmytriiev, Yu. M. Lazar

Odessa, Ukraine

The role of preoperative intraocular pressure and corneal rigidity in prognostication of surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification with IOL implantation in patients with cataract were investigated.

It is established that preoperative true IOP (PASCAL) and corneal rigidity influence on prognostication of surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification. The mathematical prognosis model for surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification depending on corneal rigidity was developed.

References

1.Аветисов С. Э. Возможности и перспективы изучения биомеханических свойств роговицы / С. Э. Аветисов // Российские Медицинские Вести. 2011. — № 1, Том XVI. — С. 94- 96.

2.Сергиенко Н. М. Изучение биомеханических свойств роговицы при миопии / Н. М. Сергиенко, И. В. Шаргородская // Офтальмол. журн. — 2011. — № 5. — С. 24- 26.
Crossref

3.Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation / R. Kucumen, N. Yenerel, E. Gorgun [et al.] // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. — 2008. — Vol. 34, № 12. — P. 2096- 2098.
Crossref

4.Gills J. P. Combined toric intraocular lens implantation and relaxing incisions to reduce high preexisting astigmatism // J. P. Gills, M. Van der Karr, M. Cherchio // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. — 2002. — Vol. 28, № 9. — P. 1585-1588.
Crossref

5.Gontijo L. Corneal rigidity in numbers / http://escrs.con-ference2web.com/content/4496/ // 27th Congress of the ESCRS : — Barcelona, 2009.

6.Hill W. Expected effects of surgically induced astigmatism on AcrySof toric intraocular lens results / W. Hill // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. — 2008. — Vol. 34, № 3 — P. 364- 367.
Crossref

7.Leffler C. Prediction of postoperative astigmatism in cataract surgery / C. Leffler, G. Javey, M. Mahmood // Can. J. Ophthalmol. — 2008. — Vol. 43, № 5 — P. 551- 554.
Crossref

8.Luce D. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer / D. Luce // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. — 2005. — Vol. 31, № 1 — P. 156- 162.C
Crossref

9.Qammar A. Paired opposite clear corneal incisions to correct preexisting astigmatism in cataract patients / A. Qammar, P. Mullaney // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. — 2005. — Vol. 31, № 6. — P. 1167- 1170.
Crossref

10.Sawhney S. Theoretical validity of vector analysis for aggregate astigmatic data / S. Sawhney // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. — 2002. — Vol. 28, № 3 — P. 385-386.
Crossref

11.Sergienko N. Determining corneal hysteresis and preexisting intraocular pressure / N. Sergienko, I. Shargorodska // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. — 2009. — Vol. 35, № 12. — P. 2033-2034.
Crossref

12.Vector analysis of astigmatic changes after cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens implantation / J. Alio, D. Pinero, J. Tomas, A. Aleson // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. — 2011. — Vol. 37, № 6. — P. 1038- 1049.
Crossref