J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2021;2:30-36.

Pdf

http://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh202253036

Received: 07.09.2022; Accepted: 06.10.2022; Published on-line: 27.10.2022


A novel technique of evisceration or enucleation secondary to trauma, chronic uveitis or uveal melanoma, with permanent and removable fixation of the ocular prosthesis in a musculoskeletal stump

A. P. Maletskyi 1,  N. M. Bigun 2

1 SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine); Odesa (Ukraine)

2 Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital; Lviv (Ukraine)

TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Maletskyi AP, Bigun NM. A novel technique of evisceration or enucleation secondary to trauma, chronic uveitis or uveal melanoma, with permanent and removable fixation of the ocular prosthesis in a musculoskeletal stump. J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2022;5:30-6.    http://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh202253036

 

Background: The state and motility of a cosmetic ocular prosthesis are important.

Purpose: To develop a novel technique of evisceration or enucleation secondary to trauma, chronic uveitis or uveal melanoma, with permanent and removable fixation of the ocular prosthesis in a musculoskeletal stump (MS).

Material and Methods: Group 1 comprised 52 patients with chronic uveitis secondary to trauma and phthisis bulbi who underwent evisceration. After evisceration, a polymer composite implant or a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) implant was used to shape an MS with a hole in it for the pegged prosthesis, and the prosthesis motility in these patients was compared with that in the 13 controls in whom an MS without a hole in it for the pegged prosthesis was shaped. Group 2 comprised 31 patients with uveal melanoma who underwent enucleation with a PTFE implant used to shape an MS with a hole in it. The prosthesis motility in these patients was measured and compared with that in the 100 controls in whom an MS without a hole in it for the pegged prosthesis was shaped.

Results: In patients of group 1, total prosthesis motility at 3 and 12 months improved to 132.50 ± 6.40 and 147.30 ± 6.70, respectively, versus 103.70 ± 18.30 and 103.10 ± 6.00, respectively, in the controls. No implant exposure was observed over the follow-up period. In three patients of group 2, diastasis of the conjunctival margins with implant exposure was observed at the margin of the hole at months 3 and 7, which necessitated implant removal. In patients of group 2, total prosthesis motility in the four meridians at 3 and 12 months was 141.60 ± 14.70 and 142.20 ± 16.10, respectively, versus 106.10 ± 13.00 and 103.70 ± 18.30, respectively, in the controls.

Conclusion: We found that firm fixation of the pegged ocular prosthesis in the MS allowed improving total prosthesis motility in the four meridians at 3 months and 12 months after evisceration, by 28.8о and 44.2о, respectively, and at 3 months and 12 months after enucleation, by 35.5о and 38.5о, respectively.

Keywords: PTFE implants, polymer composite implants, musculoskeletal stump, trauma, uveitis, uveal melanoma

 

References

1.Grusha OV, Lutsevich EA, Grusha IaO. [Major principles of treatment of traumatic orbit deformations]. In: [Proceedings of the symposium on the current problems in ophthalmology]. 26-27 Sep, 2003. Moscow, Russia. P.18-9. Russian.

2.Mosiak NA. [Comparative assessment of different methods  of shaping a musculoskeletal stump after enucleation: an experimental and clinical study]. Abstract of Thesis for the Degree of Cand Sc (Med). Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy. Odesa, Ukraine; 1989. Russian.

3.Karcioglu ZA.  Actinomyces infection in porous polyethylene orbital implant. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1997 Jul; 235(7): 448-51.

Crossref  PubMed

4.Anina IeI, Levtiukh VI. [Surgical and therapeutic restoration of vision]. In: [Proceedings of the twelfth symposium in ophthalmology]. June 29 – July 1, 2001, Chernivtsi, Ukraine. p.8. Ukrainian.

5.Vasil'eva SF, Gorgiladze TU, Grachev NN. [Method of enucleation with the formation of a mobile base for the prosthesis]. Oftalmol Zh. 1986;(1):61-2. Russian.

6.Krasilnikova VL, Kovalenko IuD, Iakhnitskaia LK. [Delayed muscoskeletal stump plasty with a composite implant based on aluminum oxide ceramic foam and nanocrystal hydroxyapatite]. In: [Proceedings of the 2nd Congress of the Black Sea Ophthalmological Society]. 8-10 Sep, 2004. Odesa, Ukraine. p.145. Russian.

7.Bigun NM. [New surgical approaches and implant materials in reconstructive surgery in the orbital and periorbital area: experimental and clinical studies].  Thesis for the Degree of Cand Sc (Med). Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy. Odesa, Ukraine; 2019. Ukrainian.

8.Accuracy of diagnosis of choroidal melanomas in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study. COMS report no. 1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990 Sep;108(9):1268-73.

Crossref  PubMed

9.Gundorova RA, Khoroshilova-Maslova IP, Bykov VP, et al. [Experimental and morphological results of implantation of carbon felt in plastic surgery of the locomotor stump and accessory system of the eye]. Vestnik Oftalmologii. 1996; 1: 27-31. Russian.

10.Maletskyi AP, Samchenko IuM, Vit VV, Bigun NM, Kernosenko LO. [Response of orbital and auricular soft tissues to the developed hydrogel implant in rabbits]. Arkhiv oftalmologii Ukrainy. 2018;6(2):20-7. Ukrainian.

Crossref

11.Simchuk IV. [Analysis of results of surgical treatment and ocular prosthesis after evisceronucleation]. Arkhiv oftalmologii Ukrainy. 2016;4(1):72-80. Ukrainian.

Crossref  

12.Kaltreider SA, Newman SA. Prevention and management of complications associated with the hydroxyapatite implant. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996 Mar; 12 (1):18-31.

Crossref  PubMed

13.Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA, Fowlkes LB, Engh CA. The pros and cons of polyethylene sterilization with gamma irradiation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec;(429):54-62.

Crossref  PubMed

14.Jordan D R, Klapper SR. Wrapping hydroxyapatite implants. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999; 30 (5): 403-407.

Crossref  

15.Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Bawazeer A. Coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implant (bio-eye): experience with 158 patients. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jan;20(1):69-74.

Crossref  PubMed

16.Maletskyi AP. [A method of shaping a hole in the musculoskeletal stump in patients after evisceration secondary to trauma and slow uveitis]. Patent of Ukraine № 46980 A61F 2/14. Information Bulletin No.1 issued Jan 11, 2010. Ukrainian.

17.Dubkova VI, Glinnik AV, Maletskyi AP, Maievskaia OI, Bigun NM. [Carbon-fiber composite material for soft tissue defect repair]. Patent of Belarus № 121881 issued Jan 29, 2018. Russian.

18.Bigun NM, Maletskyi AP, Melnichenko LM, Makarova IV, Demidova LV.  [A method of comparing the peg of the ocular prosthesis with a hole in the musculoskeletal stump in patients after evisceration or enucleation secondary to trauma, slow uveitis or intraocular neoplasm]. Patent of Ukraine № 135224 A 61F 2/00. Information Bulletin No.12 issued Jun 25, 2019. Ukrainian.

19.Pasyechnikova NV, Maletskyi AP, Naumenko VO, Poliakova SI, Chebotariov EP, Pukhlik ES. [Use of high-frequency electric welding in enucleation for uveal melanoma]. In: [Proceedings of the 12th Congress of Ukrainian ophthalmologists]. 26-28 May, 2010. Odesa, Ukraine. p.22. Russian.  

20.Maletskyi AP. [A method of shaping a hole in the musculoskeletal stump in patients after enucleation]. Patent of Ukraine № 46980 A61F 2/14. Information Bulletin No.1 issued Jan 11, 2010. Ukrainian.

21.Maletskyi AP, Bushuieva NM, Chebotariov EP. [Ocular prosthesis]. Patent of Ukraine № 11682 A61F 2/14. Information Bulletin No.1 issued Jan 16, 2006. Ukrainian.

22.Maletskyi AP, Dubkova VI, Maievska OI, Bigun NM. [Application of polymer composite materials in shaping a musculoskeletal stump after evisceration: Preliminary results]. Oftalmol Zh. 2013;(6):57-61. Russian.

Crossref 

 

Disclosures 

Corresponding Author: Maletskyi A. P., Email: maletskiy@filatov.com.ua

Author Contributions: Maletskyy AP: Conceptualization, Project administration, Data Curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Bigun NM: Data Curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding sources:  The study is a portion of the Development of Novel Synthetic Polymer Implants with Immobilized Biologically Active Substances and Assessment of Tissue Response at the Orbital and Periorbital Area, a research program.

Conflict of interest:  The authors state that they have no conflict of interest that might bias this work.

The study was conducted in the clinical setting. Ethical standards were adhered to throughout the study