J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2018;1:31-35.

https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201813135

Comparing outcomes of treatments with ETRANS-based electrical stimulation versus electrical phosphene stimulation in patients with accommodative dysfunction

Shakir Dukhayer, MD, N.M. Bushuyeva, Dr Sc (Med), V.S. Ponomarchuk, Dr Sc (Med), Prof., N.I. Khramenko, Cand Sc (Med)

Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy

Odesa (Ukraine)

E-mail: bushuyevan@gmail.com            

Purpose: To investigate the influence of ocular electrical stimulation (either ETRANS-based or electrical phosphene stimulation (EPS)) on the accommodative, convergence and pupillary system in patients with accommodative dysfunction using objective computerized pupillography.

Materials and Methods: Of a total of 59 low myopic children and adolescents with accommodative spasm included in the study, 39 underwent ocular electrical stimulation with the use of ETRANS apparatus, and 20 underwent EPS of the eye. The computerized pupillographer OK-2 was used to obtain images of direct response, consensual response and accommodative convergence response.

Results: ETRANS-based electrical stimulation and EPS imposed a unidirectional effect on patients with accommodative dysfunction, with mean percentage improvement in uncorrected visual acuity of 33% and 49%, respectively, and 2.86 times and 4.1 times increases, respectively, in mean accommodative reserve, compared to baseline. In addition, minimum pupil area (after presentation of the stimulus for accommodative convergence), delay in pupillary contraction and active pupillary contraction time decreased by 13%, 10.7%, and 11.5%, respectively, after ETRANS-based electrical stimulation, and active pupillary contraction time decreased by 27% after EPS.

Keywords: accommodative dysfunction, low myopia, electrical stimulation, ETRANS, electrical phosphene stimulation, computerized pupillography

 

References

  1. Ananin VF, Ananin VV. [Eye and pharmacology]. Moscow: Biomedinform; 1994. Russian
  2. Bushuyeva N, Boychuk I, Chrаmenko N, Ponomarchuk V, Slobodjanik S, Ushan E. A method diagnosing accommodation disorders with studying of pupil reactions. Neuroophthalmology. 2001; 5(1-2): 75
  3. [Autonomic disorders: Clinical picture, diagnosis and treatment]. A.M. Vein (Ed.).  Moscow: Meditsinskoe informatsionnoe agenstvo; 1998. Russian
  4. Videnina IV. [Pupillary size in pre-school and school-age children with emmetropia or ametropia]. [Abstract of Cand Sc (Med) Thesis]. Odessa: Filatov Institute of Eye Disease and Tissue Therapy; 1988. 23 p. Russian
  5. Vit VV. [Structure of human visual system]. Odessa: Astroprint; 2003. Russian
  6. Drozdov AG. [State and treatment of the accommodation, convergence and papillary system in children with low myopia]. [Abstract of Cand Sc (Med) Thesis]. Odessa: Filatov Institute of Eye Disease and Tissue Therapy; 1992. 16 p. Russian 2. Bushuieva NM, Ushan OV, Shakir MKh Duhire. [Method for diagnosing accommodative and pupillary dysfunction]. Information Bulletin No. 4, Declar. Pat. of Ukraine №6,231 A61F 9/00 issued 15.04.2005. Ukrainian
  7. Zabolotnykh VA, Zabolotnykh II, Lebedev VP.  [A method for treating neurocirculatory dystonia]. USSR Inventor's Certificate # 1,389,780.
  8. Bushuieva NM, Ushan OV, Shakir MKh Duhire. [Method for treating accommodative dysfunction by ocular electrical stimulation with the use of ETRANS apparatus]. Information Bulletin No. 1, Declar. Pat. of Ukraine №11,639 A61F 9/00, A61H 31/00 issued 16.01.2006. Ukrainian