J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2017;6:32-36.

https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201763236

Dimensions of ciliary body structures in various axial lengths in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

O.S. Zadorozhnyy, CandSc (Med), Alibet Yassine, Postgraduate Student, A.S. Kryvoruchko, G.V. Levytska, CandSc (Med), N.V. Pasyechnikova, DrSc (Med), Prof.

Filatov Institute of Eye Disease and Tissue Therapy

Odesa, Ukraine

E-mail: laserfilatova@gmail.com              

Background: Ciliary body size may be objectively assessed by ultrasound scanning and near-infrared transpalpebral transillumination.

Purpose: To investigate the dimensions of ciliary body structures in various axial eye lengths in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Materials and Methods: This study included 35 RRD patients (35 eyes) with an intact fellow eye who were under observation. These were divided into three groups, based on axial length of the eye with RRD.  All patients underwent near-infrared transpalpebral transillumination (NIR TPT) and ultrasound scanning of the anterior eye.

Results: In patients with axial length ranging from 20 mm to 22.9 mm, 23 mm to 24.9 mm, and larger than 25 mm, pars plana width was 3.4 mm, 4.16 mm, and 4.95 mm, respectively, whereas pars plicata width was 1.9 mm, 1.99 mm, and 2.0 mm, respectively, and pars plicata thickness was 0.75 mm, 0.75 mm, and 0.72 mm, respectively.

Conclusions: A direct relationship exists between pars plana width and axial length, but pars plicata thickness and width do not depend on the axial length in eyes with RRD. There was no difference in pars plana width or pars plicata width between the eye with RRD and unaffected fellow eye. In the eye with RRD, the pars plicata thickness was thicker than that in the intact fellow eye, which may evidence the presence of intraocular inflammation.

Keywords: rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, infrared radiation, near-infrared transpalpebraltransillumination      

References

  1. Alibet Y, Levytska G, Umanets N, Pasyechnikova N, Henrich PB. Ciliary body thickness changes after preoperative anti-inflammatory treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment complicated by choroidal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthal. 2017; 255(8):1503-1508.
    Crossref   Pubmed
  2. Wang Z, Chung C, Lin J, et al. Quantitative Measurements of the Ciliary Body in Eyes With Acute Primary-Angle Closure. InvestOphthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57: 3299-3305.
    Crossref   Pubmed
  3. Zadorozhnyy O, Korol A, Nevska A, Kustryn T, Pasyechnikova N. Ciliary body imaging with transpalpebral near-infrared transillumination – a pilot study. Klinikaoczna. 2016;3:184-6
  4. Pasyechnikova N, Naumenko V, Korol A, Zadorozhnyy O. Digital imaging of the fundus with long-wave illumination. KlinOczna. 2009;111(1-3):18-20
  5. Zadorozhnyy OS, Kryvoruchko AS, Kogan MB, Korol AR, PasyechnikovaNV. [Morphometric parameters of ciliary body structures in various axial lengths]. Zhurnal NAMN Ukrainy.  2017;1:23-8.Russian
  6. Wei WB, Xu L, Jonas JB, et al. Subfoveal choroidal thickness: the Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2013 Jan;120(1):175-80.
    Crossref   Pubmed
  7. Vit VV. [The structure of the human visual system]. Odessa: Astroprint; 2003. Russian
  8. Hairston RI, Maguire AM, Vitale S, et al. Morphometric analysis of pars plana development in humans. Retina. 1997;17:135–8.
    Crossref   Pubmed
  9. Sudhalkar A, Chauhan P, Sudhalkar A, Trivedi RH. Pars Plana Width and Sclerotomy Sites. Ophthalmology. 2012 Jan;119(1):198-9.e1-3.
    Crossref   Pubmed
  10. Oliveira C, Tello C, Liebmann JM, Ritch R.. Ciliary body thickness increases with increasing axial myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 140: 324–5.
    Crossref   Pubmed
  11. Kuchem MK, Sinnott LT, Kao CY. Ciliary muscle thickness in anisometropia. Optom Vis Sci. 2013; 90: 1312–20.
    Crossref   Pubmed
  12. Ernst LE, Sinnott LT, Bailey MD. Ciliary Body Thickness, Refractive Error, and Axial Length in Adults. InvestOphthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49: 3580.
    Crossref   Pubmed