J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2016;3:31-35.

https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201633135

Evaluation of glaucoma surgery efficiency

Novytskyy I., Rudavska L., Novytskyy M.

Lviv medical university, Ukraine

Е-mail: INovytskyy@gmail.com

Introduction. The choice of the assessment criteria is important to evaluate the glaucoma surgery efficiency. 

Purpose. To develop a comprehensive assessment and to propose a scoring scale of glaucoma surgery efficiency. 

A comprehensive system to evaluate glaucoma surgery efficiency was proposed as a ratio of hypotensive effect and safety of operation. Surgical success was defined as complete (IOP ≤ 15 mmHg without glaucoma medication, reduction in IOP ≥ 30%); qualified (IOP ≤ 15 mmHg with glaucoma medication, reduction in IOP from 20 % to 30 %) and poor (IOP > 15 mmHg with glaucoma medication, reduction in IOP to 20 %), considering a number of medications pre- and postoperatively, duration of hypotensive effect, reoperations. Safety of the surgery was evaluated as nature and number of intra- and postoperative complications, particularly those that led to the irreversible lost of visual acuity. The cost of operation, the time of rehabilitation, additional manipulations also should be considered. The scoring scale of efficiency of glaucoma surgery was proposed as follows: 4-6 scores, high efficiency of operation; from 1 to 3 scores, mean efficiency of operations; less than 1 point, the efficiency of operations is low. 

Conclusion: Unified criteria are essential for an objective evaluation of glaucoma surgery efficacy.  Such success criteria as hypotensive effect and its intensity, number of additional medication, hypotensive effect duration, additional procedures and reoperations, complications and their nature, and vision acuity loss rates need to be considered for unified complex assessment of glaucoma surgery success.

 

References

  1. Rotchford AP,   King AJ. Moving the goal posts definitions of success after glaucoma surgery and their effect on reported outcome. Ophthalmology. 2010;117 (1):18-23.
  2. Eslami Y, Mohamadi M, Khodaparast  M, Rahmanikhah E, Zarei R, Moghimi S, Fakhraie G. Sutureless tunnel trabeculectomy without peripheral iridectomy: a new modification of the conventional trabeculectomy. Int Ophthalmol. 2012;32(5):449-59.    
  3. Jea SY, Francic BA, Vakili G, Rhee DJ.   Ab interno trabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2012;119 (1):36-42. 
  4. Olai C, Rotchford AP, King AJ. Outcome of repeat trabeculectomies. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2011;39(7):658-64.   
  5. Eid TM, Tantawy WA. Combined viscocanalostomy-trabekulectomy for management of advanced glaucoma – a comparative study of the contralateral eye: a pilot study. Afr J Ophthalmol. 2011;18(4):292-7.
  6. Supawavej C,  Nouri-Mahdavi K, . Law SK,  Caprioli J. Comparison of results of initial trabeculectomy with mitomycin C after prior clear-corneal phacoemulsification to outcomes in phakic eyes. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(1):52-9.   
  7. Takihara Y, Inatani M, Seto T, Iwao K,  Iwao M,  Inoue T,  Kasaoka N,  Murakami A,  Futa R,  Tanihara H. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin for open-angle glaucoma in phakic vs pseudophakic eyes after phacoemulsification. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011; Feb 129 (2):152-7.
  8. Werth JP,  Gesser C,  Klemm  M. [Diverse effectiveness of the trabectome for different types of glaucoma]  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2015; Jan 232(1):72-8. German.
  9. Lavryk N.S. [Clinico-experimental substantiation of application new synthetic implant in not penetrating surgery of open angle glaucoma]. Author’s thesis for the candidate of medical science degree in specialty 14.01.18 – ophthalmology. – National Medical Academy of Post-graduate education named after P.L. Shupik, Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Kyiv, 2011. 21 p. Russian. 
  10. Bach-Holm D,  Storr-Paulsen A, Norregaard JC. A comparative study of trabeculectomy and the new clear-cornea filtering procedure, intrastromal diathermal keratostomy (IDK). Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(8):704-8.
  11. Cankaya AB, Elgin U. Comparison of the Outcome of Repeat Trabeculectomy with Adjunctive Mitomycin C and Initial Trabeculectomy. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011;25(6):401–8.   
  12. Meyer LM,  Graf NE,  Philipp S,  Fischer MT,  Haller K,  Distelmaier P,  Schönfeld  CL. Two-year outcome of repeat trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in primary open-angle and PEX glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2015; May-Jun 25(3):185-91.
  13. Terminology and Guidelines For Glaucoma - 4th Edition. Savona: SvetPrint; 2014. 191 p.
  14. Law SK, Shih K, Tran DH, Coleman AL, Caprioli J. Long-term outcomes of repeat vs initial trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(5):685-695.    
  15. Lusthaus JA, Kubay O, Wechsler D, Booth F. Primary trabeculectomy with mitomycin C: safety and efficacy at 2 years. Clin Experimet Ophthalmol. 2010; 38 (9): 831-8. 
  16. Veselovskaya ZF, Veselovskaya NN, Zherebko IB. [Some aspects of the pathology of the filter pads after glaucoma filtration operation]. [Collection of papers “Current issues of medical science and practice”]. 2009; 75(2): 37-40. Russian. 
  17. Alekseev VN, Malevannaya OA, Akhmad AZ. [Hyphema as a complication of antihypertensive operations]. 2010;3(1):22-25. Russian. 
  18. Kostyuk NO. [Microinvasive surgical treatment “tunnel trabeculopuncture” and “tunnel sinusosclerocleisis” in primary glaucoma]. Author’s thesis for the degree of the Candidate of Medical Sciences by specialty 14.01.18 - ophthalmology. – National Medical Academy of Post-graduate Education named after P.L.Shupik, Health ministry of Ukraine, Kyiv, 2009. 20 p. Russian. 
  19. Edmunds B, Thompson JR, Salmon JF, Wormald RP. The National Survey of Trabeculectomy. III. Early and late complications. Eye (Lond). 2002;16(3):297-303.
  20. Shmireva VF, Petrov SYu, Makarova AS. [Causes of long-term  decrease of glaucoma surgery hypotensive effect and possibilities of its enhancement]. Glaucoma. 2010;2:43-9. Russian. 
  21. Palejwala N, Ichhpujani P, Fakhraie G, Myers JS, Moster MR, Katz LJ. Single needle revision of failing filtration blebs: a retrospective comparative case series with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010;20(6):1026-34.
  22. Rotchford AP, King  AJ. Needling revision of trabeculectomies bleb morphology and long-term survival. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(7):1148-53.
  23. Anand N, Arona S. Surgical revision of failed filtration surgery with mitomycin C augmentation. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:456–61.
  24. Penchuk VV. [The efficacy of new methods of forecasting and prevention of cataract after surgical treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma]. Author’s thesis. 2014. 19 p. Russian. 
  25. Patel HY,  Danesh-Meyer HV. Incidence and management of cataract after glaucoma surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24(1):15-20.
  26. Burr JM,  Mowatt G,  Hernández R et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(41): 1-190.
  27. Patel HY,  Wagschal LD,  Trope GE,  Buys  YM. Economic analysis of the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device versus trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma. 2014; Aug;23(6); 385-90.