https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh20131913
FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY OF THE EYE MOTOR SYSTEM AND LABILITY OF THE VISUAL ANALYZER IN PATIENTS WITH MYOPIA OF MILD DEGREE
Ponomarchuk V. S., Pavlyuchenko K. P., Kephi Nyssan
Odessa, Donetsk, Ukraine
There was studied the state of the functional mobility of the eye motor system (FMES) and lability of the visual analyzer in different kinetic regimens — horizontal (H), vertical (V), chaotic (C) in patients with myopia of mild degree.
There was shown the reduction of FMES indices in the chaotic regimen by 0.3 Hz (17.8 %) in comparison with V and H in patients with myopia of mild degree; the reduction degree increased by 0.66 Hz (37.5 %) compared with the norm.
The lability index of the visual analyzer in critical frequency of flicker fusion (CFFF) is the same in all three regimens both in monocular and binocular studies and is 40 Hz. While the index of critical frequency of flicker appearance (CFFA) was 37Hz, which was lower than CFFF index on an average by 3 Hz (8 %).
References
1.Абрамов А. В., Усанова Т. Б., Скрипаль А. В., Усанов Д. А. Видеотехнология количественного контроля движения глазного яблока при нистагме // Вестн. офтальмол. — 2002. — № 4. — С. 38-41
2.Барабанщиков В. А. Методы регистрации движений глаз: теория и практика // Психологическая наука и образование. — 2010. — № 5. — С. 240- 254.
3.Вит В. В. Строение зрительной системы человека. — Одесса: Астропринт, 2003. — 655 с.
4.Демидов А. А., Жегалло А. В. Оборудование SMI для регистрации движений глаз: тест-драйв // Эксперимент, психология. — 2008. — № 1.
5.Жегалло А. В. Система регистрации движений глаз SMI High Speed: особенности использования // Экс-периментальная психология. — 2009. — № 4.
6.David T, Smye S, James T, Dabbs T. Time-dependent stress and displacement of the eye wall tissue of the human eye // Med Eng Phys. — 1997. — Mar; 19(2). — P. 131-9.
Crossref
7.DiScenna A. O., Das V., Zivotofsky A. Z. Evaluation of a video tracking device for measurement of horizontal and vertical eye rotations during locomotion //J Neurosci Methods. — 1995. — Vol. 58. — P. 89.
Crossref
8.Lancaster W. B. Terminology in ocular motility and allied subjects // Am J Ophthalmol. — 1943. — Vol. 26. — P. 122.
Crossref
9.Leigh R. J., Zee D. S. The Neurology of Eye Movements. — 4th ed. — New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
10.Muller C, Stoll W, Sclimal F. The effect of optical devices and repeated trials on the velocity of saccadic eye movements // Acta Otolaryngol. — 2003. — - May; 123 (4). — P: 471-6.
Crossref
11.Von Noorden G. K., Mackensen G. Pursuit movements in normal and amblyopic eyes. An electro-ophthalmo-graphic study. II. Pursuit movements in amblyopic patients // Am J Ophthalmol. — 1962. — Vol. 53. — P. 477.
Crossref
12.Von Noorden G. K., Campos E. C. Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility. Theory and management of strabismus. — 6th ed. — Mosby. A Harcourt Health Sciences Company. — St. Louis, London, Philadelphia, Sydney, Toronto,2002. -- 654 p.
13.Wong A. M. F. Eye Movement Disorders —1 st Edition. — Oxford University Press, 2007. — 274 p.
