Oftalmol Zh.2010;4:26-29.

http://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201042629

CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CATARACT AND PRESBYOPIA BY USING DIFFRACTION-REFRACTION IOL ACRYSOF RESTOR

Kolomiets V. A., Dmitriev S. K., Dushenchuk T. V., Lazar Yu.M.

Odessa, Ukraine

The aim of work was to study the clinical and functional results of the cataract and presbyopia treatment with the use of the diffraction-refraction IOL AcrySof ReSTOR. There were investigated 39 patients after PEC and implantation of IOL AcrySof ReSTOR. 18 eyes were implanted SN6AD3 IOL (lgroup); 21 eye — SN60D3 (2 group). 18 patients were performed bilateral implantation of IOL. After the operation the analysis of special contrasting sensitivity and the amplitude of pseudo-accommodation was carried out. It was revealed that the indices of the contrasting sensitivity in patients with diffraction- refraction IOL AcrySof ReSTOR do not differ from the analogous indices of the healthy persons.

 

References

1.Балашевич Л. И., Тахтаев Ю. В. Первый опыт клинического применения мультифокальных интраокулярных линз AcrySof ReSTOR // Збірник наукових праць співробітників КМАПО ім. П. Л. Шупика випуск 13, книга 4, Київ 2004., C. 45- 52.

2.Балашевич Л. И. Рефракционная хирургия // СПб.: Издательский дом СПбМАПО, 2002, C. 238.

3.Искаков И. А. К вопросу о псевдоаккомодации при монофокальной артифакии // Офтальмохирургия. — 1998. — № 1. — С. 62- 64.

4.Сергиенко Н. М., Тутченко Н. Н. Измерение глубины фокуса и псевдоаккомодации при артифакии // Офтальмол. журн. — 2006. — № 2. — С.26- 30.

5.Чупров А. Д., Замыров А. А., Плотникова Ю. А. О некоторых особенностях оптической системы артифакичных глаз и возможных механизмах псевдофакической аккомодации // Офтальмохирургия. — 1998. — № 2. — С.26- 30.

6.Arens В., Freudenthaler N., Quentin C. D. Binocular function after bilateral implantation of monofocal and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses // J. Cataract Refract. Surg. — 1999. — Vol. 25, № 3. — P. 399- 404.
Crossref

7.Ito M, Shimizu K. Reading ability with pseudophakic monovision and with refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: comparative study // J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Sep;35(9):1501- 4.
Crossref

8.Kohnen T., Allen D., Boureau C. et al. European multi-center study of the AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive intraocular lens // Ophthalmology. — 2006. — Vol. 113, № 4. — P. 584-588.
Crossref

9.Pandita D., Raj S. M., Vasavada V. A. et al. Contrast sensitivity and glare disability after implantation of AcrySof IQ Natural aspheric intraocular lens // J. Cataract Refract. Surg. — 2007. — Vol. 33. — P. 603-610.
Crossref

10.Pearce J. L. Multifocal intraocular lenses // Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. — 1997. -Vol. 8. — No.1. — P. 2-5.

11.Pomerance G, Evans D. Test-Retest Reliability of the CSV-1000 Contrast Test and Its Relationship to Glaucoma Therapy // Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994. 35(9); 3357-3361.)

12.Seidensticker F, Schaumberger M. et al. Long-Term Experience of a Pseudo-Accommodative Lens // Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2010 Mar 9